Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.False individual patient data and zombie randomised controlled trials submitted toAnaesthesia
J. B. Carlisle
ANAESTHESIA (2021)
撤稿声明: Nifedipine alone or combined with sildenafil citrate for management of threatened preterm labour: a randomised trial (Retraction of Vol 126, Pg 729, 2019)
M. A. Maher et al.
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY (2021)
Understand low-quality evidence: learn from food chains
Rui Wang et al.
FERTILITY AND STERILITY (2020)
Empirically generated reference proportions for baseline p values from rounded summary statistics
M. J. Bolland et al.
ANAESTHESIA (2020)
To share or not to share data: how valid are trials evaluating first-line ovulation induction for polycystic ovary syndrome?
Esmee M. Bordewijk et al.
HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE (2020)
撤稿声明: Sildenafil Citrate Therapy for Oligohydramnios: A Randomized Controlled Trial (Retraction of Vol 129, Pg 615, 2017)
M. A. Maher et al.
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY (2020)
Plagiarism and data falsification are the most common reasons for retracted publications in obstetrics and gynaecology
L. M. Chambers et al.
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY (2019)
Rounding, but not randomization method, non-normality, or correlation, affected baseline P-value distributions in randomized trials
Mark J. Bolland et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2019)
Baseline P value distributions in randomized trials were uniform for continuous but not categorical variables
Mark J. Bolland et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2019)
Re: Plagiarism and data falsification are the most common reasons for retracted publications in obstetrics and gynaecology
Wentao Li et al.
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY (2019)
Randomised controlled trials evaluating endometrial scratching: assessment of methodological issues
Wentao Li et al.
HUMAN REPRODUCTION (2019)
Evidence for compromised data integrity in studies of liberal peri-operative inspired oxygen
P. S. Myles et al.
ANAESTHESIA (2019)
Trialists' Intent to Share Individual Participant Data as Disclosed at ClinicalTrials.gov
Annice Bergeris et al.
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2018)
Data sharing and reanalysis of randomized controlled trials in leading biomedical journals with a full data sharing policy: survey of studies published in The BMJ and PLOS Medicine
Florian Naudet et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2018)
Data sharing and reanalysis of randomized controlled trials in leading biomedical journals with a full data sharing policy: survey of studies published in The BMJ and PLOS Medicine
Florian Naudet et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2018)
Seeking and reporting apparent research misconduct: errors and integrity
E. D. Kharasch et al.
ANAESTHESIA (2018)
Evidence for non-random sampling in randomised, controlled trials by Yuhji Saitoh
J. B. Carlisle et al.
ANAESTHESIA (2017)
A computationally simple central monitoring procedure, effectively applied to empirical trial data with known fraud
Rutger M. van den Bor et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2017)
Application of Benford's law: a valuable tool for detecting scientific papers with fabricated data? A case study using proven falsified articles against a comparison group
S. Hullemann et al.
ANAESTHESIST (2017)
An Appraisal of the Carlisle-Stouffer-Fisher Method for Assessing Study Data Integrity and Fraud
Edward J. Mascha et al.
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA (2017)
The GRIM Test: A Simple Technique Detects Numerous Anomalies in the Reporting of Results in Psychology
Nicholas J. L. Brown et al.
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL AND PERSONALITY SCIENCE (2017)
Compliance with prospective trial registration guidance remained low in high-impact journals and has implications for primary end point reporting
Rafael Dal-Re et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2016)
Systematic review and statistical analysis of the integrity of 33 randomized controlled trials
Mark J. Bolland et al.
NEUROLOGY (2016)
Data Sharing at a Crossroads
Frank Rockhold et al.
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (2016)
Statistical Monitoring in Clinical Trials: Best Practices for Detecting Data Anomalies Suggestive of Fabrication or Misconduct
David Knepper et al.
THERAPEUTIC INNOVATION & REGULATORY SCIENCE (2016)
Calculating the probability of random sampling for continuous variables in submitted or published randomised controlled trials
J. B. Carlisle et al.
ANAESTHESIA (2015)
Application of methods for central statistical monitoring in clinical trials
Amy A. Kirkwood et al.
CLINICAL TRIALS (2013)
Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased?
R. Grant Steen et al.
PLOS ONE (2013)
Scientific fraud in 20 falsified anesthesia papers. Detection using financial auditing methods
J. Hein et al.
ANAESTHESIST (2012)
Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications
Ferric C. Fang et al.
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (2012)
Retractions in the scientific literature: do authors deliberately commit research fraud?
R. Grant Steen
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS (2011)
Why and how do journals retract articles? An analysis of Medline retractions 1988-2008
Elizabeth Wager et al.
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS (2011)
Unusual clustering of coefficients of variation in published articles from a medical biochemistry department in India
Mark L. Hudes et al.
FASEB JOURNAL (2009)
How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data
Daniele Fanelli
PLOS ONE (2009)
Ensuring trial validity by data quality assurance and diversification of monitoring methods
Colin Baigent et al.
CLINICAL TRIALS (2008)
Repairing research integrity
Sandra L. Titus et al.
NATURE (2008)