4.6 Review

eHealth interventions targeting nutrition, physical activity, sedentary behavior, or obesity in adults: A scoping review of systematic reviews

Journal

OBESITY REVIEWS
Volume 22, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/obr.13295

Keywords

eHealth; nutrition; obesity; physical activity

Funding

  1. Singapore Population Health Improvement Centre [NMRC/CG/C026/2017_NUHS]
  2. Victoria Cancer Agency Mid-Career Fellowship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presented a scoping review aimed at evaluating the current evidence level in the field of eHealth interventions. Analysis of 106 systematic reviews published between 2006 and 2019 revealed that most reviews evaluated the effectiveness of interventions, but the methodological quality of the majority of them was critically low.
A vast body of evidence regarding eHealth interventions for nutrition, physical activity, sedentary behavior, and obesity exists. This scoping review of systematic reviews aimed to evaluate the current level of evidence in this growing field. Seven electronic databases were searched for systematic reviews published until October 27, 2019. The systematic reviews must have included adult participants only and have evaluated eHealth behavioral interventions with the primary aim of changing nutrition, physical activity, and sedentary behavior or treating or preventing overweight and obesity. One hundred and six systematic reviews, published from 2006 to 2019, were included. Almost all (n = 98) reviews evaluated the efficacy of interventions. Over half (n = 61) included interventions focused on physical activity, followed by treatment of obesity (n = 28), nutrition (n = 22), prevention of obesity (n = 18), and sedentary behavior (n = 6). Many reviews (n = 46) evaluated one type of eHealth intervention only, while 60 included two or more types. Most reviews (n = 67) were rated as being of critically low methodological quality. This scoping review identified an increasing volume of systematic reviews evaluating eHealth interventions. It highlights several evidence gaps (e.g., evaluation of other outcomes, such as reach, engagement, or cost effectiveness), guiding future research efforts in this area.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available