4.7 Article

Identification of a bona fide microRNA biomarker in serum exosomes that predicts hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after liver transplantation

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 112, Issue 3, Pages 532-538

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2014.621

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. apan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) foundation
  2. Sagawa Foundation for Promotion of Cancer Research, Japan foundation
  3. Novartis Foundation for the Promotion of Science, Japan foundation
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26861085] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Predictive biomarkers for the recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have great benefit in the selection of treatment options, including liver transplantation (LT), for HCC. The purpose of this study was to identify specific microRNAs (miRs) in exosomes from the serum of patients with recurrent HCC and to validate these molecules as novel biomarkers for HCC recurrence. Methods We employed microarray-based expression profiling of miRs derived from exosomes in the serum of HCC patients to identify a biomarker that distinguishes between patients with and without HCC recurrence after LT. This was followed by the validation in a separate cohort of 59 HCC patients who underwent living related LT. The functions and potential gene targets of the recurrence-specific miRs were analysed using a database, clinical samples and HCC cell lines. Results We found that miR-718 showed significantly different expression in the serum exosomes of HCC cases with recurrence after LT compared with those without recurrence. Decreased expression of miR-718 was associated with HCC tumour aggressiveness in the validated cohort series. We identified HOXB8 as a potential target gene of miR-718, and its upregulation was associated with poor prognosis. Conclusion Circulating miRs in serum exosomes have potential as novel biomarkers for predicting HCC recurrence.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available