4.5 Article

Tungsten-zirconium carbide-rhenium alloys with extraordinary thermal stability

Journal

FUSION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN
Volume 106, Issue -, Pages 56-62

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2016.03.063

Keywords

W-0.5wt.%ZrC-1wt.%Re alloy; Recrystallization temperature; Thermal stability

Funding

  1. National Magnetic Confinement Fusion Program [2015GB112000]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11575241, 11374299, 51301164, 11375230, 11274305, 11475216]
  3. Anhui provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [1408085QE77]
  4. [2015HSC-UP005]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The low recrystallization temperature (1200 degrees C) of pure W is a serious limitation for application as facing plasma materials in fusion reactor. In this paper, W-0.5wt.%ZrC-lwt.%Re (WZR) alloy with recrystallization temperature up to 1800 degrees C was prepared by mechanical milling and spark plasma sintering. The grain size of WZR alloy is about 2.6 mu m, smaller than that of pure W (4.4 mu m), which keeps unchanged until the annealing temperature increases to 1800 degrees C. Tensile tests indicate that the WZR alloys exhibit excellent comprehensive properties: the ductile to brittle transition temperature of WZR is in the range from 400 degrees C to 500 degrees C, about 200 degrees C lower than that of pure W prepared by the same process; the total elongation (TE) of WZR at 600 degrees C is above 30%, which is about 2 times that of pure W (at 700 degrees C). Meanwhile its tensile strength keeps 450 MPa before and after 1800 degrees C annealing as well as its TE increases after annealing. WZR alloy exhibits higher hardness (489HV) than that of pure W (453HV) at room temperature. Microstructure analysis indicates that the strengthening of nano-sized ZrC particles dispersion and Re solid solution improve tensile properties and thermal stability of WZR alloy. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available