4.6 Article

Early Outcomes After Carotid Endarterectomy and Carotid Artery Stenting: A Propensity-Matched Cohort Analysis

Journal

NEUROSURGERY
Volume 89, Issue 4, Pages 653-663

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyab250

Keywords

Revascularization; Stroke; Readmission; Mortality; Morbidity; Myocardial infarction; Length of stay; Readmission; Reoperation; Discharge destination

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated rates of adverse outcomes after carotid artery stenting (CAS) and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in a large national database. Results showed that CAS was associated with increased odds of post-procedural stroke, while odds of cardiac arrest and 30-day reoperation decreased compared to CEA. Rates of myocardial infarction, prolonged length of stay, discharge to destination other than home, 30-day readmission, and 30-day mortality were statistically similar between the two procedures.
BACKGROUND: Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS) represent options to treat many patients with carotid stenosis. Although randomized trial data are plentiful, estimated rates of morbidity and mortality for both CEA and CAS have varied substantially. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate rates of adverse outcomes after CAS and CEA in a large national database. METHODS: We analyzed 84191 adult patients undergoing elective, nonemergent CAS (n = 81361) or CEA (n = 2830), from 2011 to 2018, in the American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Odds of adverse outcomes (30-d rates of stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), cardiac arrest, prolonged length of stay (LOS), readmission, reoperation, and mortality) were evaluated in propensity-matched (n = 2821) cohorts through logistic regression. RESULTS: In the propensity-matched cohorts, CAS had increased odds of periprocedural stroke (odds ratio [OR] 1.97, 95% CI 1.32-2.95) and decreased odds of cardiac arrest (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.13-0.84) and 30-d reoperation (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.44-0.80) compared to CEA. Relative odds of MI, prolonged LOS, discharge to destination other than home, 30-d readmission, or 30-d mortality were statistically similar. In the unmatched patient population, rates of adverse outcomes with CEA were constant over time; however, for CAS, rates of stroke increased over time. In both the matched and unmatched patient cohorts, patients 70 yr and older had lower rates of post-procedural stroke with CEA, but not with CAS, compared to younger patients. CONCLUSION: In a propensity-matched analysis of a large, prospectively collected, national, surgical database, CAS was associated with increased odds of periprocedural stroke, which increased over time. Rates of MI and death were not significantly different between the 2 procedures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available