4.7 Review

Is autonomic function during resting-state atypical in Autism: A systematic review of evidence

Journal

NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS
Volume 125, Issue -, Pages 417-441

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.02.041

Keywords

Autism spectrum disorder; Autonomic arousal; Resting State; Heart rate variability; Electrodermal activity; Pupillometry

Funding

  1. Baily Thomas Charitable Fund
  2. National Institute for Health Research Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre Mental Health & Technology Theme [BRC121520003]
  3. University of Nottingham

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The findings suggest that differences in autonomic arousal during resting-state exist in autistic individuals, with 60.8% of studies finding evidence of group differences between neurotypical and autistic participants. While hyperarousal was more common, hypo-arousal and autonomic dysregulation were also consistently present.
Background: Theories of differences in resting-state arousal in autistic individuals are influential. Differences in arousal during resting-state would impact engagement and adaptation to the environment, having a cascading effect on development of attentional and social skills. Objectives: We systematically evaluated the evidence for differences in measures of autonomic arousal (heart rate, pupillometry or electrodermal activity) during resting-state in autistic individuals; to understand whether certain contextual or methodological factors impact reports of such differences. Data sources: We searched PsycInfo, MEDLINE and EMBASE databases for papers published until 16th May 2019. Of 1207 titles initially identified, 60 met inclusion criteria. Results and Conclusions: Of the 51 studies that investigated group differences between neurotypical and autistic participants, 60.8 % found evidence of group differences. While findings of hyperarousal were more common, particularly using indices of parasympathetic function, findings of hypo-arousal and autonomic dysregulation were also consistently present. Importantly, experimental context played a role in revealing such differences. The evidence is discussed with regard to important methodological factors and implications for future research are described.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available