4.4 Review

Interictal Cognitive Deficits in Migraine Sufferers: A Meta-Analysis

Journal

NEUROPSYCHOLOGY REVIEW
Volume 32, Issue 4, Pages 736-757

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11065-021-09516-1

Keywords

Migraine; Interictal; Aura; Cognition; Neuropsychology; Meta-analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

During the interictal period, migraineurs showed a moderate negative effect on complex attention, immediate and delayed memory, spatial cognition, and executive functioning. This effect was not related to migraine history, attack frequency, or participant age. However, the lack of performance validity testing and limited data on mood symptomatology and migraine medication use in the included studies may potentially overestimate the magnitude of the effect.
While a significant proportion of the population suffer from migraine, the existing research literature does not provide a clear indication as to whether migraineurs experience objective cognitive deficits outside of acute migraine attacks. This meta-analysis was conducted to investigate which cognitive domains if any were affected by migraine, by synthesising the existing research quantitatively. The meta-analysis was prospectively registered with the PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews (registration no.: CRD42019134138). A search of the electronic databases PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, and PsycINFO was conducted for journal articles published between January 1980 and January 2020. Seventeen studies met the inclusion criteria, allowing for the calculation of pooled effect sizes between migraineurs (with and without aura) and healthy controls in the several cognitive domains. During the interictal period, migraineurs demonstrated a moderate, negative effect on complex attention immediate and delayed memory, spatial cognition, and executive functioning. This effect was not attributable to migraine history, attack frequency, or participant age. However, the lack of performance validity testing, and limited data on mood symptomatology and migraine medication use in the included studies may be confounds potentially overestimating the magnitude of effect. Comparison with a clinical control group, which may have accounted for some these extraneous variables, was unable to be conducted. Recommendations for comprehensive future neuropsychological research are provided.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available