4.2 Article

Safety and clinical outcome of tamoxifen in Duchenne muscular dystrophy

Journal

NEUROMUSCULAR DISORDERS
Volume 31, Issue 9, Pages 803-813

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.nmd.2021.05.005

Keywords

Duchenne muscular dystrophy; Tamoxifen

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The use of tamoxifen in DMD patients shows promising results in maintaining motor and respiratory function with a low risk of adverse effects. Further clinical trials are needed to support its use in Duchenne muscular dystrophy.
Patients having Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) are currently being treated with corticosteroids, which slow down disease progression at the expense of serious adverse effects. Tamoxifen is a pro-drug some of whose metabolites interact with the nuclear estrogen receptor, leading to anti-fibrotic and muscle-protective effects as has been demonstrated in a murine model of DMD. Here we report the results from a monocentric single arm prospective study in 13 ambulant boys aged 6-14 years with genetically confirmed DMD, aimed to assess the safety of tamoxifen and its impact on disease progression. Boys were treated for up to 3 years with 20 mg/day of oral tamoxifen, in addition to their ongoing corticosteroid treatment. For 8 of these patients, outcome was compared to an age-and performance-matched 12-month natural history dataset. The primary end point was the 6-minute walk test. Secondary end points were the NorthStar assessment, timed function tests, pulmonary function, the biomarker creatine phosphokinase and adverse effects. No adverse effects were noticed other than mild gynecomastia in 4 boys. Tamoxifen-treated patients retained motor and respiratory function, compared with a significant deterioration of age-matched historical control patients receiving corticosteroids only. These encouraging findings warrant a larger clinical trial to substantiate the use of tamoxifen in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available