4.3 Article

A Clinical Feasibility Study of Spinal Evoked Compound Action Potential Estimation Methods

Journal

NEUROMODULATION
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages 75-84

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1111/ner.13510

Keywords

Artifact; closed-loop; evoked compound action potentials; pain; spinal cord stimulation

Funding

  1. Medtronic plc

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a treatment for chronic neuropathic pain, and evoked compound action potential (ECAP) sensing has enhanced SCS. The study characterizes sensitivity of ECAP growth curve slope (S) to neural response and stimulation artifact for spinal ECAP estimation methods. Results show that SA reduction schemes using HP and AM methods outperform others in preserving neural signals and reducing artifact misclassification.
Objectives Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a treatment for chronic neuropathic pain. Recently, SCS has been enhanced further with evoked compound action potential (ECAP) sensing. Characteristics of the ECAP, if appropriately isolated from concurrent stimulation artifact (SA), may be used to control, and aid in the programming of, SCS systems. Here, we characterize the sensitivity of the ECAP growth curve slope (S) to both neural response (|S-resp|) and SA contamination (|S-art|) for four spinal ECAP estimation methods with a novel performance measure (|S-resp/S-art|). Materials and Methods We collected a library of 112 ECAP and associated artifact recordings with swept stimulation amplitudes from 14 human subjects. We processed the signals to reduce SA from these recordings by applying one of three schemes: a simple high pass (HP) filter, subtracting an artifact model (AM) consisting of decaying exponential and linear components, or applying a template correlation method consisting of a triangularly weighted sinusoid. We compared these against each other and to P2-N1, a standard method of measuring ECAP amplitude. We then fit the ECAP estimates from each method with a function representing the growth curve; we then calculated the S-resp and S-art parameters following the fit. Results Any SA reduction scheme selected may result in under- or overestimation of neural activation, or misclassification of SA as ECAP. In these experiments, the ratio of neural signal preservation to SA misclassification (|S-resp/S-art|) on the ECAP estimate was superior (p < 0.05) with the HP and AM schemes relative to the others. Conclusions This work represents the first comprehensive assessment of spinal ECAP estimation schemes. Understanding the clinically relevant sensitivities of these schemes is increasingly important, particularly with closed-loop SCS systems using ECAP as a feedback control variable where misclassification of artifact as neural signal may lead to suboptimal therapy adjustments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available