4.7 Article

Enhancing Neurofibromatosis Clinical Trial Outcome Measures Through Patient Engagement

Journal

NEUROLOGY
Volume 97, Issue 7S, Pages S4-S14

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000012430

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Academic Affiliations Advanced Fellowship Program in Health Services Research
  2. Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR)
  3. Edith Nourse Rogers Memorial Veterans Hospital
  4. Intramural Research Program of the NIH

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The survey of REiNS members showed that providing sufficient opportunities for patient representatives to engage in research tasks and fostering a respectful, inclusive atmosphere were key to their satisfaction and impact. Patient representatives were perceived to improve the organization's research by directly contributing to research tasks and indirectly influencing other stakeholders, leading to the selection of more meaningful and relevant clinical trial outcomes. Challenges to patient engagement included scheduling difficulties and concerns about the level of scientific knowledge needed to effectively engage.
ObjectiveAs part of an evaluation of the Response Evaluation in Neurofibromatosis and Schwannomatosis (REiNS) International Collaboration patient representative program, we surveyed REiNS members to (1) identify facilitators and barriers to involving patient representatives and (2) understand whether and how involving patient representatives affected recommendations for clinical trial outcomes.MethodsWe administered an anonymous online survey to all REiNS members. Facilitators and barriers to patient representative involvement were solicited using a modified free listing technique; responses were inductively grouped into higher-order categories and ranked based on saliency score (Smith s). Open-ended questions assessed patient representative expectations for engagement, perceived benefits/costs of patient engagement, and patient representative contributions; responses were analyzed using conventional content analysis.ResultsA total of 63/172 (37%) members responded, including 18/30 (60%) patient representatives. Providing sufficient opportunities to meaningfully engage in research tasks and cultivating a respectful, inclusive atmosphere were key facilitators to patient representatives' satisfaction and ability to make an impact. Respondents perceived that patient representatives directly (through their input on research tasks) and indirectly (through effects on other stakeholders' knowledge and communication style) improved the organization's research, leading to selection of more meaningful, relevant, and feasible clinical trial outcome measures. Ongoing challenges to patient engagement include difficulty scheduling meetings and concerns about the level of scientific knowledge patient representatives needed to effectively engage.ConclusionsInvolving patient representatives in REiNS improved perceived quality of neurofibromatosis clinical trial outcome measures. Negotiating sufficient opportunities to engage, fostering an inclusive atmosphere, and navigating time pressures are key to effective patient engagement.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available