4.7 Article

Recovery and Prediction of Bimanual Hand Use After Stroke

Journal

NEUROLOGY
Volume 97, Issue 7, Pages E706-E719

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000012366

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Promobilia Foundation
  2. STRO-KERiksforbundet
  3. NEURO Sweden
  4. Lars Hedlund (Karolinska Institutet) [2-1582/2016]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to determine similarities and differences in key predictors of recovery of bimanual hand use and unimanual motor impairment after stroke. The findings suggest that recovery of bimanual activity depends on the extent of corticospinal tract injury and initial sensory and cognitive impairments, with the FMA-SAFE score capturing most of the variance explained by these mechanisms. FMA-SAFE score, as a straightforward clinical measure, strongly predicts bimanual recovery.
Objective To determine similarities and differences in key predictors of recovery of bimanual hand use and unimanual motor impairment after stroke. Method In this prospective longitudinal study, 89 patients with first-ever stroke with arm paresis were assessed at 3 weeks and 3 and 6 months after stroke onset. Bimanual activity performance was assessed with the Adult Assisting Hand Assessment Stroke (Ad-AHA), and unimanual motor impairment was assessed with the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA). Candidate predictors included shoulder abduction and finger extension measured by the corresponding FMA items (FMA-SAFE; range 0-4) and sensory and cognitive impairment. MRI was used to measure weighted corticospinal tract lesion load (wCST-LL) and resting-state interhemispheric functional connectivity (FC). Results Initial Ad-AHA performance was poor but improved over time in all (mild-severe) impairment subgroups. Ad-AHA correlated with FMA at each time point (r > 0.88, p < 0.001), and recovery trajectories were similar. In patients with moderate to severe initial FMA, FMA-SAFE score was the strongest predictor of Ad-AHA outcome (R-2 = 0.81) and degree of recovery (R-2 = 0.64). Two-point discrimination explained additional variance in Ad-AHA outcome (R-2 = 0.05). Repeated analyses without FMA-SAFE score identified wCST-LL and cognitive impairment as additional predictors. A wCST-LL >5.5 cm(3) strongly predicted low to minimal FMA/Ad-AHA recovery (<= 10 and 20 points respectively, specificity = 0.91). FC explained some additional variance to FMA-SAFE score only in unimanual recovery. Conclusion Although recovery of bimanual activity depends on the extent of corticospinal tract injury and initial sensory and cognitive impairments, FMA-SAFE score captures most of the variance explained by these mechanisms. FMA-SAFE score, a straightforward clinical measure, strongly predicts bimanual recovery.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available