4.2 Article

Switch from rasagiline to safinamide in fluctuating Parkinson's disease patients: a retrospective, pilot study

Journal

NEUROLOGICAL RESEARCH
Volume 43, Issue 11, Pages 950-954

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/01616412.2021.1942408

Keywords

Parkinson's disease; rasagiline; safinamide; wearing-off

Funding

  1. MIUR [RM118164354FDC62]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Switching PD patients from rasagiline to high-dose safinamide may provide more powerful benefits in fluctuating PD patients, significantly reducing subjective symptoms of wearing-off without any reported adverse events.
Besides the inhibition of monoamine-oxidase-B, high-dose safinamide (100 mg) also blocks voltage-gated Na+ and Ca++ channels and inhibits glutamate release at overactive synapses. This latter mechanism may provide further benefit to fluctuating Parkinson's disease (PD) patients compared to rasagiline. Here, we retrospectively investigated the consequences of shifting from rasagiline to high-dose safinamide in PD patients reporting symptoms of wearing-off, defined by the Wearing-Off-Questionnaire-19 (WOQ-19) score >= 3 at baseline. Seventeen PD patients were switched from rasagiline 1 mg to safinamide 100 mg because of the report of symptoms of fluctuations while under therapy with either levodopa+rasagiline or levodopa+rasagiline+dopamine agonists, or re-occurrence of fluctuations previously corrected by add-on with rasagiline. Patients were re-evaluated 4-6 months after switch. Switch to safinamide 100 mg produced benefit in 9/17 (52.9%) subjects, together with significant reduction of subjective symptoms of wearing-off. There was no report of adverse events. Findings from this retrospective, exploratory study suggest that safinamide 100 mg may produce more powerful benefit that rasagiline 1 mg as add-on to levodopa in fluctuating PD patients, possibly because of the bimodal mechanism of action of the former drug.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available