4.4 Article

Mutualism with aggressive wood-degrading Flavodon ambrosius (Polyporales) facilitates niche expansion and communal social structure in Ambrosiophilus ambrosia beetles

Journal

FUNGAL ECOLOGY
Volume 23, Issue -, Pages 86-96

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.funeco.2016.07.002

Keywords

Ambrosiophilus; Ambrosiodmus; Flavodon ambrosius; Polyporales; Communality; Wood decay; Lignin degradation; Fungus farming; Symbiosis

Funding

  1. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Forest Service (FS)-SRS Coop agreement [14-CA-11330130-032]
  2. USDA-FS-FHP Coop agreement [12-CA-11420004-042]
  3. USDA [100007, 14-8130-0377-CA]
  4. National Science Foundation [DEB 1256968]
  5. Division Of Environmental Biology
  6. Direct For Biological Sciences [1256968] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Most wood-boring insects compete with wood decaying basidiomycetes for woody biomass. One Glade of ambrosia beetles gained access to rotten wood - an abundant resource unsuitable to most wood-boring insects - by evolving a farming-like mutualism with a white rot polypore. Here we show the mutualist of Ambrosiodmus/Ambrosiophilus, the polypore Flavodon ambrosius, is superior in lignocellulolytic capacity compared to Ascomycota ambrosia fungi and other white rot Basidiomycota. This mutualism facilitated the evolution of large, long-lived, communal colonies with overlapping generations and egg-laying by pre-dispersal progeny females. F. ambrosius resembles other white tot Polyporales in that it causes significant weight loss in wood decay assays and strong polyphenol oxidase reactions, indicative of lignin-modifying enzymes. The symbiosis is asymmetrical: there are many species of Ambrosiodmus and Ambrosiophilus but all use a single known species of Flavodon, which determines the ecological strategy of the entire insect Glade. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd and British Mycological Society. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available