4.3 Article

Guyanagarika, a new ectomycorrhizal genus of Agaricales from the Neotropics

Journal

FUNGAL BIOLOGY
Volume 120, Issue 12, Pages 1540-1553

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.funbio.2016.08.005

Keywords

Basidiomycota; Cryptic species; Dicymbe; Fungal diversity; Systematics

Categories

Funding

  1. Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology at the University of Tennessee
  2. National Science Foundation (NSF) [DEB-0918591, DEB-1556412]
  3. National Geographic Society's Committee for Research and Exploration [6679-99, 7435-03, 8481-08]
  4. Linnean Society of London
  5. Explorers Club
  6. NSF [DEB-1051782, DEB-1354802]
  7. Smithsonian Institution's Biological Diversity of the Guiana Shield Program [223]
  8. Direct For Biological Sciences
  9. Division Of Environmental Biology [1354802] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A new genus and three new species of Agaricales are described from the Pakaraima Mountains of Guyana in the central Guiana Shield. All three of these new species fruit on the ground in association with species of the ectomycorrhizal (ECM) tree genus Dicymbe (Fabaceae subfam. Caesalpinioideae) and one species has been shown to form ectomycorrhizas. Multi-locus molecular phylogenetic analyses place Guyanagarika gen. nov. within the Catathelasma Glade, a lineage in the suborder Tricholomatineae of the Agaricales. We formally recognize this 'Catathelasma Glade' as an expanded family Catathelasmataceae that includes the genera Callistosporium, Catathelasma, Guyanagarika, Macrocybe, Pleurocollybia, and Pseudolaccaria. Within the Catathelasmataceae, Catathelasma and Guyanagarika represent independent origins of the ectomycorrhizal habit. Guyanagarika is the first documented case of an ECM Agaricales genus known only from the Neotropics. (C) 2016 British Mycological Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available