4.3 Article

A comparison between cactophilic yeast communities isolated from Cereus hildmannianus and Praecereus euchlorus necrotic cladodes

Journal

FUNGAL BIOLOGY
Volume 120, Issue 10, Pages 1175-1183

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.funbio.2016.06.003

Keywords

Cactophilic arthropods; Cactophilic yeasts; Cactus-yeast-Drosophila model system; D. buzzatti; Yeast dispersion

Categories

Funding

  1. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico-CNPq [117785/2014-8, 155274/2013-9]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the cactus-yeast-Drosophila model system, the necrotic cladode is used as substrate by a diverse and specific microbiota, which is utilized as food source by Drosophila. Although this association has been the focus of many studies in arid regions of North America, little is known of its composition in South America. This study analysed yeast communities isolated from two South American cacti species: Cereus hildmannianus and Praecereus euchlorus. Fourteen yeast species were isolated and identified by their morpho-physiological character and partial rRNA gene sequencing. Arthropods hatched from the analysed cladodes were identified. There was little similarity between the isolated yeast communities either in terms of cacti species (S = 0.286) or collection sites (S = 0.214-0.335). To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first time that Metschnikowia koreensis and Hannaella sinensis have been described in association with cacti. Also, Drosophila buzzatti has not been described in association with Praecereus. The similarity between cactophilic arthropod communities found in the different cacti was low (S = 0.266) and zero when only Drosophila was considered. These results suggest that exploration by Drosophila species is the main factor that drives low yeast community similarity between cacti species. (C) 2016 British Mycological Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available