4.5 Review

It's not just a phase: function and characteristics of RNA-binding proteins in phase separation

Journal

NATURE STRUCTURAL & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Volume 28, Issue 6, Pages 465-473

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41594-021-00601-w

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  2. National Institutes of Health [NIH R01GM130866]
  3. American Heart Association [19CDA34660248]
  4. NIH-NIGMS [T32GM119999]
  5. NSF Graduate Research Fellowship Program [DGE-1650116]
  6. Program in Translational Medicine at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  7. Mechanistic, Interdisciplinary Biology (MiBio) Graduate Training Program at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The organization of RNA in phase-separated condensates provides insights into how sequestration of RNA-binding proteins and RNAs modulates gene expression. This understanding has implications for basic cell biology, the pathogenesis of human diseases, and the development of novel therapies. Biomolecular condensates formed through phase separation play a crucial role in coordinating cellular reactions and regulating various biological phenomena.
The organization of multiple steps of the RNA life cycle in phase-separated condensates presents a framework for understanding how sequestration of RNA-binding proteins and RNAs modulates gene expression. Biomolecular condensates that form via phase separation are increasingly regarded as coordinators of cellular reactions that regulate a wide variety of biological phenomena. Mounting evidence suggests that multiple steps of the RNA life cycle are organized within RNA-binding protein-rich condensates. In this Review, we discuss recent insights into the influence of phase separation on RNA biology, which has implications for basic cell biology, the pathogenesis of human diseases and the development of novel therapies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available