4.7 Review

The genetics of obesity: from discovery to biology

Journal

NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages 120-133

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41576-021-00414-z

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Novo Nordisk Foundation
  2. US National Institutes of Health [R01DK110113, R01DK107786, R01HL142302, R01 DK124097]
  3. Medical Research Council (MRC Metabolic Diseases Unit) [MC_UU_00014/1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this review, Loos and Yeo summarize our current understanding of the genetic underpinnings of monogenic and polygenic obesity, highlighting shared genetic and biological underpinnings between the two forms of obesity. Genome-wide association studies with increasing sample sizes have driven recent discoveries, with post-GWAS collaborations facilitating translation of genetic loci into meaningful biology and new treatment avenues.
In this Review, Loos and Yeo summarize our current understanding of the genetic underpinnings of monogenic and polygenic obesity. They highlight the commonalities revealed by recent studies and discuss the implications for treatment and prediction of obesity risk. The prevalence of obesity has tripled over the past four decades, imposing an enormous burden on people's health. Polygenic (or common) obesity and rare, severe, early-onset monogenic obesity are often polarized as distinct diseases. However, gene discovery studies for both forms of obesity show that they have shared genetic and biological underpinnings, pointing to a key role for the brain in the control of body weight. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) with increasing sample sizes and advances in sequencing technology are the main drivers behind a recent flurry of new discoveries. However, it is the post-GWAS, cross-disciplinary collaborations, which combine new omics technologies and analytical approaches, that have started to facilitate translation of genetic loci into meaningful biology and new avenues for treatment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available