4.6 Article

Assessment of regional drought vulnerability and risk using principal component analysis and a Gaussian mixture model

Journal

NATURAL HAZARDS
Volume 109, Issue 1, Pages 707-724

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-021-04854-y

Keywords

Drought; Risk; Vulnerability; Hazard; PCA; GMM; EWM; Copula

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korea government(MSIT) [2020R1A2C1012919]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2020R1A2C1012919] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Quantifying drought risk requires a combination of drought vulnerability and hazard. This study applied PCA, GMM, and EWM to assess drought vulnerability in Chungcheong Province, South Korea, with findings indicating higher vulnerability in agricultural and industrial sectors. The highest risk regions were identified in the southern part of the province based on objective weighting methods.
Due to the complex characteristics of drought, drought risk needs to be quantified by combining drought vulnerability and drought hazard. Recently, the major focus in drought vulnerability has been on how to calculate the weights of indicators to comprehensively quantify drought risk. In this study, principal component analysis (PCA), a Gaussian mixture model (GMM), and the equal-weighting method (EWM) were applied to objectively determine the weights for drought vulnerability assessment in Chungcheong Province, located in the west-central part of South Korea. The PCA provided larger weights for agricultural and industrial factors, whereas the GMM computed larger weights for agricultural factors than did the EWM. The drought risk was assessed by combining the drought vulnerability index (DVI) and the drought hazard index (DHI). Based on the DVI, the most vulnerable region was CCN9 in the northwestern part of the province, whereas the most drought-prone region based on the DHI was CCN12 in the southwest. Considering both DVI and DHI, the regions with the highest risk were CCN12 and CCN10 in the southern part of the province. Using the proposed PCA and GMM, we validated drought vulnerability using objective weighting methods and assessed comprehensive drought risk considering both meteorological hazard and socioeconomic vulnerability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available