4.6 Article

High-reliability graphene-wrapped nanoprobes for scanning probe microscopy

Journal

NANOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 33, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6528/ac1630

Keywords

graphene; graphene-wrapped nanoprobe; scanning probe microscopy

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFE0112100]
  2. EU H2020 Program [734174, 767285]
  3. Jilin Provincial Science and Technology Program [20180414002GH, 20180414081GH, 20180520203JH, 20190702002GH, 20190201287JC, 20200901011SF]
  4. '111' Project of China [D17017]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, a novel functional nanoprobe is presented using graphene sheets in a high-quality graphene solution wrapped round a plasma-treated conventional Pt-Ir coated nanoprobe. The graphene-wrapped nanoprobes show highly stability and resistance to degradation, leading to a significantly increased lifetime. Furthermore, they exhibit enhanced electrical conductivity and reduced tip-sample friction compared with Pt-Ir coated nanoprobes.
The nanoprobe is a powerful tool in scanning probe microscopy (SPM) that is used to explore various fields of nanoscience. However, the tips can wear out very fast due to the low stability of conventional probes, especially after the measurement of high currents or lateral friction, which results in image distortion and test imprecision. Herein, a novel functional nanoprobe is presented using graphene sheets in a high-quality graphene solution wrapped round a plasma-treated conventional Pt-Ir coated nanoprobe, which shows highly stability and resistance to degradation, leading to a significantly increased lifetime. Furthermore, we show that the graphene-wrapped nanoprobes have the advantages of enhanced electrical conductivity and reduced tip-sample friction, compared with Pt-Ir coated nanoprobes. The simplicity and low cost of this method make it valuable to various functional graphene-wrapped nanoprobes and applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available