4.3 Article

Longitudinal follow-up of serum biomarkers in patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder

Journal

MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages 512-521

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/13524585211024978

Keywords

Glial fibrillary acidic protein; neurofilament light chain; neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder; serum biomarkers

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea [NRF-2018R1C1B6008884]
  2. Ministry of Health & Welfare, South Korea [HI18C2383]
  3. Asan Institute for Life Science, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea [2020IL0026, 2020IL0018]
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [2018R1C1B6008884] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the longitudinal clinical value of serum biomarkers in NMOSD patients, finding that serum GFAP may be the most appropriate for monitoring the disease activity. Further confirmation studies are warranted to validate these findings.
Background: Recently, several serum biomarkers have been proposed in Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders (NMOSD) to monitor disease activity. Objective: The objective of the study is to evaluate the longitudinal clinical value of serum biomarkers in patients with NMOSD. Methods: We prospectively recruited consecutive NMOSD patients with anti-aquaporin-4 antibody and obtained serum samples at enrollment, after 6-12 months of follow-up (main period), and at attacks. Using single-molecule array assays, we evaluated longitudinal changes of serum neurofilament light chain (NfL), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and GFAP/NfL levels. Results: Overall, 64 patients (58 women) were enrolled (age: 51 years, disease duration: 6.7 years) and 133 samples were obtained. Among patients who did not develop new attacks during the main period (n = 62), serum levels of NfL, GFAP, and GFAP/NfL were significantly decreased over time in patients with attacks (<2 months) at enrollment (n = 14 (23%)), whereas serum NfL and GFAP levels gradually increased in the others (n = 48 (77%)). During the study, five (8%) patients developed new attacks; only serum GFAP levels increased consistently upon these events compared with baseline levels. To differentiate attacks from remissions, serum GFAP levels showed the largest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (0.876, 95% confidence interval: 0.801-0.951). Conclusion: Among NfL, GFAP, and GFAP/NfL, serum GFAP might be the most appropriate for monitoring NMOSD longitudinally, which warrants future confirming studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available