4.6 Review

Evolution and function of the epithelial cell-specific ER stress sensor IRE1β

Journal

MUCOSAL IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages 1235-1246

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41385-021-00412-8

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [R37DK048106, K01DK119414]
  2. Harvard Digestive Disease Center [P30DK034854]
  3. Harvard Digestive Disease Center Pilot and Feasibility Grant
  4. ERC Consolidator Grant [DCRIDDLE-819314]
  5. FWO [G017521N, G063218N]
  6. EOS grant [G0G7318N]
  7. FWO Aspirant grant [11Z5615N]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Barrier epithelial cells lining mucosal surfaces in the gastrointestinal and respiratory tracts play a crucial role in maintaining the balance between immunity and tolerance against environmental challenges. The extracellular mucus barrier produced by these cells is central to host defense. Molecules like IRE1 beta regulate mucosal homeostasis, with unique functions distinct from IRE1 alpha.
Barrier epithelial cells lining the mucosal surfaces of the gastrointestinal and respiratory tracts interface directly with the environment. As such, these tissues are continuously challenged to maintain a healthy equilibrium between immunity and tolerance against environmental toxins, food components, and microbes. An extracellular mucus barrier, produced and secreted by the underlying epithelium plays a central role in this host defense response. Several dedicated molecules with a unique tissue-specific expression in mucosal epithelia govern mucosal homeostasis. Here, we review the biology of Inositol-requiring enzyme 1 beta (IRE1 beta), an ER-resident endonuclease and paralogue of the most evolutionarily conserved ER stress sensor IRE1 alpha. IRE1 beta arose through gene duplication in early vertebrates and adopted functions unique from IRE1 alpha which appear to underlie the basic development and physiology of mucosal tissues.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available