4.7 Article

Observability of inflated companion stars after supernovae in massive binaries

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 505, Issue 2, Pages 2485-2499

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stab1439

Keywords

binaries: close; stars: kinematics and dynamics; supernovae: general; supernovae: individual: SN 2006jc

Funding

  1. COMPAS

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A systematic study on the response of companion stars in massive binaries impacted by supernova ejecta was conducted. It was found that the maximum luminosity during inflation phase depends on stellar mass, and a correlation between expansion duration and intersected energy was identified. The study provides insights for constraining pre-SN binary parameters and estimating the occurrence of observable inflated companions in stripped-envelope SNe.
We carry out a systematic study of the response of companion stars in massive binaries after being impacted by supernova (SN) ejecta. A total of 720 1D stellar evolution calculations are performed to follow the inflation and contraction of the star in response to the energy injection and how it depends on various parameters. We find that the maximum luminosity achieved during the inflated phase is only dependent on the stellar mass and we derive an analytic formula to describe the relation. There is also a tight correlation between the duration of expansion and the intersected energy. These correlations will be useful to constrain pre-SN binary parameters from future detections of inflated companions. We also discuss the possible outcomes of the binary system when the companion inflation is taken into account. Based on simple binary population synthesis, we estimate that similar to 1-3 per cent of stripped-envelope SNe may have observable inflated companions. Finally, we apply our models to the observed companion of SN 2006jc and place strong constraints on the possible pre-SN binary parameters.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available