4.7 Article

Cosmography using strong-lensing systems and cosmic chronometers

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 507, Issue 4, Pages 5720-5731

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stab2465

Keywords

gravitational lensing: strong; cosmological parameters; cosmology: theory

Funding

  1. CONACYT [AFB-170002]
  2. Consejo Zacatecano de Ciencia, Tecnolog'ia e Innovaci'on (COZCYT)
  3. Centro de Astrof'isica de Valpara'iso (CAV)
  4. Sistema Nacional de Investigadores (SNI)
  5. Instituto Avanzado de Cosmolog'ia (IAC)
  6. ANID REDES [190147]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presents the equation for the angular diameter distance in the y-redshift scenario for cosmography for the first time, using a new sub-sample of observed strong gravitational lens systems. The analysis shows that this new approach using strong-lensing systems is equally competitive in constraining cosmographic parameters as other methods presented in literature, and reconstructions from SLSs and joint analysis are in concordance with the standard model of cosmology at z = 0.
Using a new sub-sample of observed strong gravitational lens systems, for the first time, we present the equation for the angular diameter distance in the y-redshift scenario for cosmography and use it to test the cosmographic parameters. In addition, we also use the observational Hubble data from cosmic chronometers and a joint analysis of both data are performed. Among the most important conclusions are that this new analysis for cosmography using strong-lensing systems (SLSs) is equally competitive to constrain the cosmographic parameters as others presented in literature. Additionally, we present the reconstruction of the effective equation of state inferred from our samples, showing that at z = 0 those reconstructions from SLSs and joint analysis are in concordance with the standard model of cosmology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available