4.6 Article

Cationic Polymerization of Hexamethylcyclotrisiloxane in Excess Water

Journal

MOLECULES
Volume 26, Issue 15, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules26154402

Keywords

Piers-Rubinsztajn catalyst; surfactant-free polymerization; polydimethylsiloxane

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presents preliminary results on cationic ring-opening polymerization of hexamethylcyclotrisiloxane (D-3) in water, with a focus on experiments conducted using tris(pentafluorophenyl)borane (BCF) as the catalyst. By using different catalysts and surfactants, polymers of various molar masses can be prepared in a straightforward manner. The presence or absence of surfactants influences the size and stability of the emulsions generated during the reaction process, with a tentative mechanism proposed for the observed phenomena.
Ring-opening ionic polymerization of cyclosiloxanes in dispersed media has long been discovered, and is nowadays both fundamentally studied and practically used. In this short communication, we show some preliminary results on the cationic ring-opening polymerization of hexamethylcyclotrisiloxane (D-3), a crystalline strained cycle, in water. Depending on the catalyst or/and surfactants used, polymers of various molar masses are prepared in a straightforward way. Emphasis is given here on experiments conducted with tris(pentafluorophenyl)borane (BCF), where high-molar polymers were generated at room temperature. In surfactant-free conditions, mu m-sized droplets are stabilized by silanol end-groups of thus generated amphiphilic polymers, the latter of which precipitate in the course of reaction through chain extension. Introducing various surfactants in the recipe allows generating smaller emulsions in size with close polymerization ability, but better final colloidal stability, at the expense of low small cycles' content. A tentative mechanism is finally proposed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available