4.6 Article

Lead Assays with Smartphone Detection Using a Monolithic Rod with 4-(2-Pyridylazo) Resorcinol

Journal

MOLECULES
Volume 26, Issue 18, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules26185720

Keywords

monolithic polyurethane foam-[4-(2-pyridylazo) resorcinol]; chemical sensor; lead; smartphone; on-site screening; water monitoring

Funding

  1. Science Achievement Scholarship of Thailand (SAST)
  2. TRF Distinguished Research Professor Award [DPG6080002]
  3. Center of Excellence for Innovation in Analytical Science and Technology, Chiang Mai University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A monolithic rod of PUF-PAR was developed as a simple chemical sensor for lead assays, with smartphone detection and image processing capabilities. The method offers a fast and straightforward approach for lead detection without the need for sample preparation, showing good agreement with ICP-OES results.
A monolithic rod of polyurethane foam-[4-(2-pyridylazo) resorcinol] (PUF-PAR) as a simple chemical sensor for lead assays with smartphone detection and image processing was developed. With readily available simple apparatus such as a plastic cup and a stirrer rod, the monolithic PUF rod was synthesized in a glass tube. The monolithic PUF-PAR rod could be directly loaded by standard/sample solution without sample preparation. A one-shot image in G/B value from a profile plot in ImageJ for a sample with triplicate results via a single standard calibration approach was obtained. A linear single standard calibration was: [G/B value] = -0.038[mu g Pb2+] + 2.827, R-2 = 0.95 for 10-30 mu g Pb2+ with a limit of quantitation (LOQ) of 33 mu g L-1. The precision was lower than 15% RSD. The proposed method was tested by an assay for Pb2+ contents in drinking water samples from Bangkok. The results obtained by the proposed method agree with those of ICP-OES and with 100-120% recovery, demonstrating that the method is useful for screening on-site water monitoring.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available