4.6 Review

Imidazoles as Potential Anticancer Agents: An Update on Recent Studies

Journal

MOLECULES
Volume 26, Issue 14, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules26144213

Keywords

imidazole; benzimidazole; purine; anticancer; antimicrotubule; kinase inhibitor

Funding

  1. Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center [GR112972]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review discusses recent studies on the use of imidazole/fused imidazole derivatives as anticancer agents. These molecules exhibit anticancer activity by modulating various targets, including some compounds with unknown mechanisms.
Nitrogen-containing heterocyclic rings are common structural components of marketed drugs. Among these heterocycles, imidazole/fused imidazole rings are present in a wide range of bioactive compounds. The unique properties of such structures, including high polarity and the ability to participate in hydrogen bonding and coordination chemistry, allow them to interact with a wide range of biomolecules, and imidazole-/fused imidazole-containing compounds are reported to have a broad spectrum of biological activities. This review summarizes recent reports of imidazole/fused imidazole derivatives as anticancer agents appearing in the peer-reviewed literature from 2018 through 2020. Such molecules have been shown to modulate various targets, including microtubules, tyrosine and serine-threonine kinases, histone deacetylases, p53-Murine Double Minute 2 (MDM2) protein, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP), G-quadraplexes, and other targets. Imidazole-containing compounds that display anticancer activity by unknown/undefined mechanisms are also described, as well as key features of structure-activity relationships. This review is intended to provide an overview of recent advances in imidazole-based anticancer drug discovery and development, as well as inspire the design and synthesis of new anticancer molecules.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available