4.6 Article

Carbon Isotope Fractionation during the Formation of CO2 Hydrate and Equilibrium Pressures of 12CO2 and 13CO2 Hydrates

Journal

MOLECULES
Volume 26, Issue 14, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules26144215

Keywords

CO2 hydrate; carbon isotope; isotopic fractionation; phase equilibrium; Raman spectra

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI [26303021]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Carbon isotope fractionation was observed during the formation of CO2 hydrates, with δ13C of hydrate-bound CO2 lower than that of residual CO2. The difference in equilibrium pressures between (CO2)-C-12 and (CO2)-C-13 hydrates caused approximately 1 parts per thousand carbon isotope fractionation. More accurate pressure measurements are needed for quantitative discussions in (CO2)-C-12-H2O and (CO2)-C-13-H2O systems.
Knowledge of carbon isotope fractionation is needed in order to discuss the formation and dissociation of naturally occurring CO2 hydrates. We investigated carbon isotope fractionation during CO2 hydrate formation and measured the three-phase equilibria of (CO2)-C-12-H2O and (CO2)-C-13-H2O systems. From a crystal structure viewpoint, the difference in the Raman spectra of hydrate-bound (CO2)-C-12 and (CO2)-C-13 was revealed, although their unit cell size was similar. The delta C-13 of hydrate-bound CO2 was lower than that of the residual CO2 (1.0-1.5 parts per thousand) in a formation temperature ranging between 226 K and 278 K. The results show that the small difference between equilibrium pressures of similar to 0.01 MPa in (CO2)-C-12 and (CO2)-C-13 hydrates causes carbon isotope fractionation of similar to 1 parts per thousand. However, the difference between equilibrium pressures in the (CO2)-C-12-H2O and (CO2)-C-13-H2O systems was smaller than the standard uncertainties of measurement; more accurate pressure measurement is required for quantitative discussion.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available