4.6 Review

Perfume and Flavor Engineering: A Chemical Engineering Perspective

Journal

MOLECULES
Volume 26, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules26113095

Keywords

perfume engineering; flavors and fragrances; perfumery ternary diagram; classification of perfumes; perfumery radar; trail of perfumes; perfume performance; evaporation and diffusion of perfumes; effect of matrix; flavor engineering

Funding

  1. Associate Laboratory LSRE-LCM - national funds through FCT/MCTES (PIDDAC) [UIDB/50020/2020]
  2. FCT-Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia [NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000006f]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review provides an overview of scientific methodologies developed at the Laboratory of Separation and Reaction Engineering for the prediction of fragrance mixtures design, performance, and classification. Starting from the question of "what do we smell," the Perfumery Ternary Diagram is used to determine dominant odors, while analyzing evaporation and diffusion models based on vapor-liquid equilibrium and Fick's law. The methodology is extended to flavor and taste engineering, with future research directions suggested.
In the last two decades, scientific methodologies for the prediction of the design, performance and classification of fragrance mixtures have been developed at the Laboratory of Separation and Reaction Engineering. This review intends to give an overview of such developments. It all started with the question: what do we smell? The Perfumery Ternary Diagram enables us to determine the dominant odor for each perfume composition. Evaporation and 1D diffusion model is analyzed based on vapor-liquid equilibrium and Fick's law for diffusion giving access to perfume performance parameters. The effect of matrix and skin is addressed and the trail of perfumes analyzed. Classification of perfumes with the perfumery radar is discussed. The methodology is extended to flavor and taste engineering. Finally, future research directions are suggested.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available