4.7 Article

Expanding the conservation genomics toolbox: Incorporating structural variants to enhance genomic studies for species of conservation concern

Journal

MOLECULAR ECOLOGY
Volume 30, Issue 23, Pages 5949-5965

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/mec.16141

Keywords

conservation genetics; fitness traits; functional diversity; genome-wide diversity; pangenomes; structural variation

Funding

  1. NSF Track 2 EPSCoR Program [OIA--1826801]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Structural variants (SVs) are large rearrangements within the genome that impact gene function, and their study offers conservation genomics an exciting opportunity to enhance species recovery by complementing traditional approaches. Despite their potential influence on fitness traits, SVs remain understudied in conservation genomics.
Structural variants (SVs) are large rearrangements (>50 bp) within the genome that impact gene function and the content and structure of chromosomes. As a result, SVs are a significant source of functional genomic variation, that is, variation at genomic regions underpinning phenotype differences, that can have large effects on individual and population fitness. While there are increasing opportunities to investigate functional genomic variation in threatened species via single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data sets, SVs remain understudied despite their potential influence on fitness traits of conservation interest. In this future-focused Opinion, we contend that characterizing SVs offers the conservation genomics community an exciting opportunity to complement SNP-based approaches to enhance species recovery. We also leverage the existing literature-predominantly in human health, agriculture and ecoevolutionary biology-to identify approaches for readily characterizing SVs and consider how integrating these into the conservation genomics toolbox may transform the way we manage some of the world's most threatened species.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available