4.8 Article

Genome-wide mapping of human DNA replication by optical replication mapping supports a stochastic model of eukaryotic replication

Journal

MOLECULAR CELL
Volume 81, Issue 14, Pages 2975-+

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2021.05.024

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [HG010658, GM125872]
  2. I. Curie YPI program
  3. ATIP-Avenir program from CNRS
  4. Plan Cancer from INSERM
  5. CNRS 80|Prime interdisciplinary program
  6. ANR
  7. INCa
  8. COFUND IC-3i International PhD fellowship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study successfully mapped early-replication initiation events in human cells using the ORM method, revealing a consistent distribution of replication initiation with accessible chromatin enrichment. The results indicate that stochastic regulation of replication kinetics is a fundamental feature of eukaryotic replication.
The heterogeneous nature of eukaryotic replication kinetics and the low efficiency of individual initiation sites make mapping the location and timing of replication initiation in human cells difficult. To address this challenge, we have developed optical replication mapping (ORM), a high-throughput single-molecule approach, and used it to map early-initiation events in human cells. The single-molecule nature of our data and a total of >2,500-fold coverage of the human genome on 27 million fibers averaging similar to 300 kb in length allow us to identify initiation sites and their firing probability with high confidence. We find that the distribution of human replication initiation is consistent with inefficient, stochastic activation of heterogeneously distributed potential initiation complexes enriched in accessible chromatin. These observations are consistent with stochastic models of initiation-timing regulation and suggest that stochastic regulation of replication kinetics is a fundamental feature of eukaryotic replication, conserved from yeast to humans.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available