4.7 Article

Comparison of dolomite and lime as sorbents for in-situ H2S removal with respect to gasification parameters in biomass gasification

Journal

FUEL
Volume 181, Issue -, Pages 131-138

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2016.04.124

Keywords

In-situ desulfurization; Bubbling fluidized bed; Biomass gasification; Lime; Dolomite

Funding

  1. Austrian Research Promotion Agency (FFG) [838730]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This work presents an experimental study on the properties of lime, limestone, calcined and uncalcined dolomite regarding their application as in-situ desulfurization sorbents in biomass gasification. Several parameters have been varied consecutively in order to distinguish the differences between the CaO-based sorbents and elucidate the influence of gasification conditions on the steady state desulfurization results. The parameters include gasification temperature, residence time, steam content of the synthesis gas, and particle size of the sorbents. The conversion of sorbents has been determined to evaluate the necessary amount of sorbent required for the reduction of the residual H2S content to a steady state equilibrium value. Results show that the variation of temperature in the range of 700-825 degrees C has no influence on the residual H2S content. The variation of steam content from 30 to 42 vol% in the syngas showed a rather significant change of residual H2S for lime increasing from 330 to 786 ppm(v) and a less considerable rise of 410-578 ppm(v) H2S for dolomite under steady state conditions. For the particle size, it was shown that a lower discharge rate of larger particles in the range of 250-500 mu m was dominant as an influencing factor as compared to better pore diffusion in smaller particles of 100-200 mu m in diameter. A clear difference has been observed for the conversion of CaO to CaS in fully calcined dolomite as compared to the other sorbents tested. The conversion is clearly higher in lime, limestone and dolomite with an average of 35% as compared to fully calcined dolomite with an average of 15%. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available