4.7 Article

Structurally improved CaO-based sorbent by organic acids for high temperature CO2 capture

Journal

FUEL
Volume 167, Issue -, Pages 17-24

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2015.11.048

Keywords

CO2 capture; CaO-based sorbent; Organic acid; Modification

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51306063]
  2. Ph.D. Program Foundation of the Ministry of Education of China [20130142120047]
  3. JOINT PROJECT Royal Society of Edinburgh-National Natural Science Foundation of China [51311130318]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The acidification-decomposition process was used to enhance the performance of the natural limestone. A series of potential organic acids was employed to modify limestone to produce CaO-based sorbents for high temperature CO2 capture. The organic acids studied include formic acid, acetic acid, propionic acid, citric acid monohydrate, oxalic acid dihydrate, lactic acid, L-(-)-malic acid, and L-(+)-tartaric acid. Particularly, the latter three are novel acids used for the first time to modify limestone to obtain the CaO-based sorbents. The cyclic carbonation-calcination performance of the sorbents was investigated. All the sorbents, except the one modified by formic acid, exhibit the improved performance for capturing CO2. In particular, the novel sorbent modified by L-(+)-tartaric acid (S-T) shows the best cyclic performance with a high carbonation conversion of similar to 36% at the 26th cycle, almost twice of that of unmodified sorbent. The superior performance of this sorbent was also found when tested under the simulated oxyfuel atmosphere (realistic calcination atmosphere for post-combustion CO2 capture). It is believed that the improved structure by organic acid, which is in favor of mitigating the sintering and loss of specific surface area (SSA), has contributed to the superior performance of the sorbent. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available