4.7 Article

Structure stabilization of zeolite Y induced by yttrium and its role in promoting n-docosane conversion

Journal

MICROPOROUS AND MESOPOROUS MATERIALS
Volume 323, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2021.111225

Keywords

Catalytic cracking; Zeolite Y; Yttrium; Structure refinement

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21920102005, 21835002, 21621001]
  2. 111 Project of China [B17020]
  3. Science and Technology Project of PetroChina [2016D-5006-07]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Y3+-exchanged zeolite Y was prepared and the location of Y3+ ions was determined near the D6R's. The substitution of Y3+ ions for Na+ caused a noticeable shrinkage of the unit cell, leading to improved stability and selectivity in the FCC catalyst.
Rare earth (RE)-exchanged zeolite Y is the major active component of fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) catalysts. Herein, a series of yttrium (Y3+)-exchanged zeolites Y was prepared by the ion-exchange method, and the location of Y3+ ions in the Y3+-exchange zeolite NaY was determined by fitting synchrotron radiation X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD) pattern combined with the infrared spectra in the hydroxyl stretching region. In analogy to lanthanum (La3+)-exchanged zeolite Y, Y3+ ions were preferentially located inside the sodalite units near the double six-membered rings (D6R's), octahedrally coordinating to three framework oxygens and to three H2O molecules (or OH groups) in close proximity. The substitution of Y3+ ions for counter-ions Na + caused a noticeable shrinkage of the unit cell due mainly to the relatively small ionic radius and high charge density of Y3+ ions. As a consequence, the Y3+-exchanged HY-based FCC catalyst exhibited improved steam stability, and higher selectivity for high-value products (liquefied petroleum gas and C5+gasoline) in n-docosane cracking compared with the La3+-exchanged HY-based catalyst.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available