4.7 Article

Post-synthesis of boric acid-functionalized magnetic covalent organic framework as an affinity probe for the enrichment of N-glycopeptides

Journal

MICROCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 188, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00604-021-04998-5

Keywords

Core-shell nanomaterial; Magnetic nanoparticles; Glycopeptide enrichment; mCOF@PEI@B(OH)(2); MALDI-TOF MS; Boric acid chemistry

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21927805]
  2. Major Projects in Ningbo [2020Z090]
  3. K. C. Wong Magna Fund in Ningbo University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The novel boric acid-functionalized magnetic covalent organic framework shows excellent performance in selectively isolating glycopeptides and capturing low-abundance glycopeptides from actual biological samples effectively.
A novel type of boric acid-functionalized magnetic covalent organic framework (mCOF) with polyethyleneimine (PEI) as a linker (denoted as mCOF@PEI@B(OH)(2)) has been prepared through a post-synthesis strategy, which points out an achievable path for the construction of boronic acid-functionalized COFs. Based on the boric acid chemistry, the obtained core-shell structured mCOF@PEI@B(OH)(2) can selectively isolate glycopeptides through the modified boronic acid groups. The mCOF@PEI@B(OH)(2) exhibits excellent performance with good reusability (ten cycles), low detection limit (0.5 fmol.mu L-1), size-exclusion effect, and relatively high loading capacity (80 mu g.mg(-1)), recovery yield (94.9 +/- 2.8%), and selectivity (HRP digests:BSA digests = 1:500). Detection is done by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS). In addition, 37 endogenous glycopeptides are captured from human saliva with mCOF@PEI@B(OH)(2), providing effective proofs for its capability to capture low-abundance glycopeptides from actual biological samples.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available