4.7 Article

Fatty Acid Methyl Ester (FAME) composition used for estimation of biodiesel cetane number employing random forest and artificial neural networks: A new approach

Journal

FUEL
Volume 166, Issue -, Pages 143-151

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2015.10.118

Keywords

Biodiesel; Cetane number; Cross validation; Random forest; Neural network

Funding

  1. IPROCOM Marie Curie Initial Training Network through the People Programme (Marie Curie Actions) of the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme FP7 under REA [316555]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cetane Number (CN) is the property used to evaluate the quality of biodiesels. The CN is mainly affected by the Fatty Acids Methyl Ester (FAME) composition of the biodiesel. The common experimental methods of determination of CN is expensive and time consuming and are not always accurate, so it is vital to use other methods to predict CN. In this work, Random Forest (RF) and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) assisted by 10-fold cross validation were employed to present appropriate, reliable and more generalized models for the prediction of CN based on experimental data of 131 different FAMEs collected from literature. Two different regression models obtained based on these methods. The Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) and the coefficient of determination (R-2) of 0.95, 2.53 for ANN model, and 0.92, 3.09 for RF model showed the high accuracy of these models. In term of accuracy, ANN model showed better results compared to RF model. On the other hand, in term of transparency and ease of interpretation, the RF model could be widely applied in CN determination. The positive effect of FAMEs on CN was obtained if Stearic acid or Myristic acid was higher than 51.95% or 44.95% regardless of other FAME acid percentages. In addition, values greater than 68.4% in Linolenic acid could lead to a negative effect of that acid on CN. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available