4.5 Article

Intrapulmonary lymph node (stations 13 and 14) metastasis in peripheral non-small cell lung cancer

Journal

MEDICINE
Volume 100, Issue 27, Pages -

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000026528

Keywords

carcinoma; lymph node excision; lymph nodes; lymphatic metastasis; neoplasm staging; non-small-cell lung

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study investigated the necessity of dissecting intrapulmonary lymph nodes in peripheral non-small cell lung cancer and the metastatic pattern of the lymph nodes. The findings suggest that dissecting stations 13 and 14 may be helpful for identifying lymph node metastasis and accurately staging primary NSCLC.
It remains unknown whether dissecting the intrapulmonary lymph nodes (stations 13 and 14) when resecting peripheral non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is necessary for accurate tumor node metastasis (TNM) staging. This study investigated intrapulmonary lymph node dissection (stations 13 and 14) on the pathological staging of peripheral NSCLC and the metastatic pattern of the lymph nodes. This retrospective study included patients with primary peripheral NSCLC who underwent radical dissection between January 2013 and December 2015. The clinical data of patients and examination results of intrapulmonary stations 12, 13, and 14 lymph nodes were analyzed. Of 3019 resected lymph nodes in a total of 234 patients (12.9/patient), 263 (8.7%) had metastasis. Ninety-nine patients had lymph node metastasis (42.3%): 40 (17.1%) were N1, 11 (4.7%) were N2, 48 (20.5%) were both N1 and N2, and 135 (57.7%) had no N1 or N2 metastasis. Sixteen (6.8%) patients had metastasis of stations 13 and/or 14. Metastasis in N1 positive patients of stations 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14 were 2.7%, 10.5%, 9.8%, 10.4%, and 8.5%, respectively. Missed detection without station 13 and 14 dissection was up to 6.8% (16/234). Dissection of stations 13 and 14 could be helpful for the identification of lymph node metastasis and for the accurate TNM staging of primary NSCLC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available