4.5 Review

Operative treatments for osteochondral lesions of the talus in adults A systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal

MEDICINE
Volume 100, Issue 25, Pages -

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000026330

Keywords

cartilage regeneration; cartilage repair; meta-analysis; osteochondral lesions; systematic review; talus

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFC1103904]
  2. Talent Program of Yunnan Province [2018HB001]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2015M572718]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This systematic review of 8 studies found that cartilage regeneration and cartilage repair plus regeneration had significant advantages in improving ankle function and radiological evaluation of osteochondral lesions of the talus. However, further research is needed to define the best surgical option for treating this condition.
Purpose: This systematic review aimed to identify the available evidence regarding the comparative effectiveness and safety of various operative treatments in adult patients with osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLT). Materials and methods: The PubMed, Embase, ISI Web of Knowledge, and the Cochrane Controlled Trial Register of Controlled Trials were searched from their inception date to September 2019. Two reviewers selected the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs assessing the comparative effectiveness and safety of various operative treatments for OLT. The meta-analysis was performed using Revman 5.3. Results: Eight studies (1 RCT and 7 non-RCTs) with 375 patients were included in this review. The difference in the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score between the cartilage repair and replacement was not significant. The cartilage regeneration with or without cartilage repair had significant superiority in improving the AOFAS score compared with the cartilage repair. The difference in the magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue score between the cartilage repair and replacement and between cartilage repair and cartilage repair plus regeneration was significant. Conclusions: Cartilage regeneration and cartilage repair plus regeneration had significant superiority in improving the ankle function and radiological evaluation of OLT, although the trials included did not have high-level evidence. Moreover, which treatment between the 2 was safer could not be addressed in this review as most of the trials did not report the safety outcome. Further studies are needed to define the best surgical option for treating OLT.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available