4.5 Review

Prognostic value of platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio in neoadjuvant chemotherapy for solid tumors A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis

Journal

MEDICINE
Volume 100, Issue 29, Pages -

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000026202

Keywords

cancer; meta-analysis; platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio; prognosis

Funding

  1. the second affiliate hospital of Soochow university science and technology innovation team project funding [XKTJ-TD 202009] Funding Source: Medline
  2. the international team of gastrointestinal tumor project funding [SZYJTD201804] Funding Source: Medline
  3. import team of hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery project funding [SZYJTD201803] Funding Source: Medline
  4. the project of State key laboratory of radiation medicine and protection [GZK1202007] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In patients with solid tumors, the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) is associated with overall survival and disease-free survival, with low PLR indicating better outcomes. A high PLR is linked to a lower pathological complete response rate after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in cancer patients.
Introduction: Previous research indicates that the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) may be an indicator of poor prognosis in many tumor types. However, the PLR is rarely described in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for solid tumors. Thus, we performed a meta-analysis to investigate the prognostic value of this ratio for patients with solid tumors treated by NAC. Methods: A comprehensive search of the literature was conducted using the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases, followed by a manual search of references from the retrieved articles. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence interval (CIs) were used to evaluate the association between PLR and 3 outcomes, namely, overall survival, disease-free survival, and pathological complete response rate after NAC. Results: Eighteen studies published no earlier than 2014 were included in our study. A lower PLR was associated with better overall survival (HR = 1.46, 95% CI, 1.11-1.92) and favorable disease-free survival (HR = 1.81, 95% CI, 1.27-2.59). A PLR that was higher than a certain cutoff was associated with a lower pathological complete response rate in patients with cancer who received NAC (Odds ratio = 1.93, 95% CI, 1.40-2.87). Conclusion: Elevated PLR is associated with poor prognosis in various solid tumors. PLR may be a useful biomarker in delineating those patients with poorer prognoses who may benefit from neoadjuvant therapies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available