4.5 Article

Growth mindset in competency-based medical education

Journal

MEDICAL TEACHER
Volume 43, Issue 7, Pages 751-757

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2021.1928036

Keywords

Clinical; teaching and learning; clinical; work-based; management; role of teacher; learning outcomes; general; assessment; clinical

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The widespread adoption of CBME highlights the importance of learner-centred educational design and fostering a growth mindset in learners. Challenges include shifting away from the fixed mindset of traditional medical education, with potential solutions discussed at individual, relational, and systems levels. Future research directions aim to better understand the growth mindset within the context of CBME.
The ongoing adoption of competency-based medical education (CBME) across health professions training draws focus to learner-centred educational design and the importance of fostering a growth mindset in learners, teachers, and educational programs. An emerging body of literature addresses the instructional practices and features of learning environments that foster the skills and strategies necessary for trainees to be partners in their own learning and progression to competence and to develop skills for lifelong learning. Aligned with this emerging area is an interest in Dweck's self theory and the concept of the growth mindset. The growth mindset is an implicit belief held by an individual that intelligence and abilities are changeable, rather than fixed and immutable. In this paper, we present an overview of the growth mindset and how it aligns with the goals of CBME. We describe the challenges associated with shifting away from the fixed mindset of most traditional medical education assumptions and practices and discuss potential solutions and strategies at the individual, relational, and systems levels. Finally, we present future directions for research to better understand the growth mindset in the context of CBME.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available