4.6 Article

Fully automated noncoplanar radiation therapy treatment planning

Journal

MEDICAL PHYSICS
Volume 48, Issue 11, Pages 7439-7449

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mp.15223

Keywords

automated treatment planning; multicriteria optimization; noncoplanar treatment planning

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [1R01 CA176553, 1R01CA256890, R01CA227713, T32EB009653]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The NC-POPS algorithm provides a modular approach for fully automated treatment planning of NC IMRT cases, with the potential to substantially improve treatment planning workflow and plan quality.
Purpose To perform fully automated noncoplanar (NC) treatment planning, we propose a method called NC-POPS to produce NC plans using the Pareto optimal projection search (POPS) algorithm. Methods NC radiation therapy treatment planning has the potential to improve dosimetric quality as compared to traditional coplanar techniques. Likewise, automated treatment planning algorithms can reduce a planner's active treatment planning time and remove inter-planner variability. Our NC-POPS algorithm extends the original POPS algorithm to the NC setting with potential applications to both intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). The proposed algorithm consists of two main parts: (1) NC beam angle optimization (BAO) and (2) fully automated inverse planning using the POPS algorithm. Results We evaluate the performance of NC-POPS by comparing between various NC and coplanar configurations. To evaluate plan quality, we compute the homogeneity index (HI), conformity index (CI), and dose-volume histogram statistics for various organs-at-risk (OARs). As compared to the evaluated coplanar baseline methods, the proposed NC-POPS method achieves significantly better OAR sparing, comparable or better dose conformity, and similar dose homogeneity. Conclusions Our proposed NC-POPS algorithm provides a modular approach for fully automated treatment planning of NC IMRT cases with the potential to substantially improve treatment planning workflow and plan quality.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available