4.7 Article

Co-processing potential of HTL bio-crude at petroleum refineries - Part 1: Fractional distillation and characterization

Journal

FUEL
Volume 165, Issue -, Pages 526-535

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2015.10.094

Keywords

Hydrothermal liquefaction; Fractional distillation; Co-processing; Biomass; Bio-crude

Funding

  1. C3BO DSF [1305-00030B]
  2. FlexiFuel Grant [10-094552]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presents detailed chemical and thermophysical analysis of bio-crude from a continuous hydrothermal liquefaction research plant. Current research on bio-crude focuses mainly on specific biomass feedstocks and conversion process conditions and resulting yields rather than on bio-crude properties for downstream processing. This study contributes to the next level of research, where HTL bio-crude is evaluated as a potential refinery co-processing feedstock with regard to bulk and fractional properties. The bio-crude used in the current work has been produced from a hardwood feedstock. Bio-crude assays, adapted from conventional crude oil assays, have been obtained, including fractionation of the bio-crude through 15:5 vacuum distillation. The bio-crude and its fractions have been analyzed with respect to heating value, elemental composition, density and oxygen-containing functional groups. Results show a highly promising bio-crude quality, with a higher heating value of 40.4 MJ/kg, elemental oxygen content of 5.3 wt.%, a specific gravity of 0.97 and a distillation recovery of similar to 53.4 wt.% at an atmospheric equivalent temperature (AET) of 375 degrees C,. Results show that only minor upgrading is needed to achieve co-processing properties and to obtain a refinery bio-feed. This forms the basis for subsequent assessment of drop-in and co-processing potential and parametric upgrading trials of the bio-crude presented in part 2 of this work. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available