4.5 Article

Abnormal Macrophage Polarization in Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndrome

Journal

MEDIATORS OF INFLAMMATION
Volume 2021, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

HINDAWI LTD
DOI: 10.1155/2021/9913382

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81170472]
  2. Key Technology Research and Development Program of Tianjin China [18ZXDBSY00140]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study identified abnormal macrophage subsets in bone marrow of MDS patients, suggesting they may play a role in altering the bone marrow microenvironment.
Background. This study is aimed at assessing the subsets of bone marrow macrophages in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and exploring the role of macrophages in the pathogenesis of MDS. Methods. Thirty-eight newly diagnosed MDS patients were enrolled in the Department of Hematology of General Hospital of Tianjin Medical University from June 2015 to June 2016. Bone marrow monocytes and macrophage subsets (M1/M2) were detected in patients with MDS and normal controls by flow cytometry. M1 macrophages were cultured in vitro, and the expression of IL-1 beta and TNF-alpha mRNA was measured using real-time polymerase chain reaction. Results. Compared with the normal control group, the proportion of bone marrow monocytes was higher (2.11 +/- 0.93% vs. 3.66 +/- 3.38%), and the mean fluorescence intensity of surface molecule CD14 was lower in the higher-risk (HR) MDS group (639.05 +/- 359.78 vs. 458.26 +/- 306.72, p<0.05). The ratio of M2 macrophages to monocytes was higher in patients with HR-MDS (1.82 +/- 2.47% vs. 3.93 +/- 3.81%, p<0.05). The ratio of M1 to M2 macrophages was lower in the HR-MDS group (3.50 +/- 3.22 vs. 1.80 +/- 0.88, p<0.05). The expression of IL-1 beta and TNF-alpha mRNA in M1 macrophages was significantly lower in the MDS group (p<0.05). Conclusions. Patients with MDS had abnormal macrophage polarization, which may be involved in the alteration of bone marrow microenvironments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available