4.7 Article

Modeling and validation of hydro-mechanical losses in pressure compensated external gear machines

Journal

MECHANISM AND MACHINE THEORY
Volume 161, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2021.104310

Keywords

External gear machines; Gear pumps; Hydro-mechanical efficiency; Torque loss; Friction; Pump modeling

Funding

  1. Casappa S.P.A.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a novel methodology for modeling the hydro-mechanical losses in external gear machines (EGMs). The study shows that meshing friction is the dominant source of torque losses, and the predicted efficiencies from the model match those observed in experiments.
During the operation of external gear machines (EGMs), the friction between the internal components results in the loss of hydro-mechanical (or torque) performance of these units. However, current EGM simulation models either do not consider these losses or have significant limitations in their approach. This paper presents a novel methodology for modeling the hydro-mechanical losses in EGMs. The sources of torque losses considered are the friction at the gears' tooth tips, lateral surfaces, shafts, and meshing interfaces. The friction models are developed for each of these sources considering the effects of micromotion of the gears and bushings. Further, the effects of elastohydrodynamic lubrication (EHL) are considered in the modeling of meshing friction. The friction models are integrated in a lumped parameter simulation tool, and the operation of a commercial gear pump is simulated. From the simulation results, the meshing friction is determined to be the dominant source of torque losses. Further, the hydro mechanical efficiencies predicted by the model are found to match those observed in the experiments indicating the validity of the model developed in this work. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available