4.7 Article

Combined effects of climate change and the herbicide diuron on the coral Acropora millepora

Journal

MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN
Volume 169, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112582

Keywords

Great Barrier Reef; Climate change; Coral; Herbicide; Ocean acidification; Diuron

Funding

  1. Australian Government's National Environmental Science Program (NESP) Tropical Water Quality Hub Project [2.1.6, 5.2]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that the Great Barrier Reef is negatively impacted by the combined effects of the contaminant diuron and climate change, particularly affecting the physiological responses of corals, with photosynthesis being significantly affected. It suggests that water quality guideline values may need to be adjusted as climate conditions change.
The Great Barrier Reef (GBR) is threatened by climate change and local pressures, including contaminants in nearshore habitats. This study investigated the combined effects of a GBR-relevant contaminant, the herbicide diuron, under current and two future climate scenarios on the coral Acropora millepora. All physiological responses tested (effective quantum yield (AF/Fm '), photosynthesis, calcification rate) were negatively affected with increasing concentrations of diuron. Interactive effects between diuron and climate were observed for all responses; however, climate had no significant effect on AF/Fm ' or calcification rates. Photosynthesis was negatively affected as the climate scenarios were adjusted from ambient (28.1 degrees C, pCO2 = 397 ppm) to RCP8.5 2050 (29.1 degrees C, pCO2 = 680 ppm) and 2100 (30.2 degrees C, pCO2 = 858 ppm) with EC50 values declining from 19.4 to 10.6 and 2.6 mu g L-1 diuron in turn. These results highlight the likelihood that water quality guideline values may need to be adjusted as the climate changes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available