4.7 Article

Biofilm growth on buoyant microplastics leads to changes in settling rates: Implications for microplastic retention in the Great Lakes

Journal

MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN
Volume 170, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112573

Keywords

Plastic pollution; Microplastics; Biofilm; Density change; Freshwater pollution; The Great Lakes

Funding

  1. NSERC [RGPIN-2016-06542]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study reveals that the sinking rate of microplastics in a lake environment is influenced by biofilm development, leading to increased density and eventual sedimentation. Smaller particles sink more easily than larger particles, resulting in size-based fractionation during sedimentation in lakes.
Buoyant microplastic pollution disperses widely from sources via strong wind-driven water currents in lakes and oceans. This ability for dispersal depends critically upon the particle's density, which can change over time due to microbial growth (biofilm). This study quantifies biofilm-induced sinking rates of irregularly-shaped polypropylene granules (-125-2000 mu m) via ex-situ experiments emulating a Great Lakes freshwater environment. Biofilm development increases particle density and lowers microplastic rise velocities, eventually causing sinking. We observed sinking for 100% of small and intermediate microplastics, and 95% of large microplastics. Under constant environmental conditions, sinking onset was observed sooner for smaller particles (-125-212 mu m, 18 days) than for larger particles (-1000-2000 mu m, 50 days). Differences in settling onset would lead to sizefractionation of particle sedimentation, whereby smaller particles are deposited closer to their sources relative to larger particles. Our study demonstrates a novel mechanism by which buoyant microplastics can selectively sink from the lake surface.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available