4.7 Article

Persistent organic pollutant (POPs) concentrations from great-winged petrels nesting in Western Australia

Journal

MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN
Volume 168, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112396

Keywords

Breaksea Island; Great Australian Bight; Organochlorine pesticide; PBDE; PCB; Seabird

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation, United States

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Studies on greatwinged petrels in southern Western Australia revealed the presence of persistent organic pollutants such as organochlorine pesticides, polychlorinated biphenyls, and novel brominated flame retardants. This adds valuable data to the limited POPs information available for marine fauna in remote regions, indicating that even remote areas are impacted by global trends of POPs distributions.
Marine animals that traverse coastal and offshore environments are potentially exposed to multiple sources of pollution. Baseline data of pollutant concentrations of these fauna are needed in remote areas as human populations grow and economic development increases because changes may affect local wildlife in unforeseen ways. Persistent organic pollutant (POPs) concentrations were quantified in an understudied seabird, the greatwinged petrel (Pterodroma macroptera), that breeds in southern Western Australia. Organochlorine pesticides, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), and novel brominated flame retardants (NBFRs) were measured in adults. Total POPs concentrations ranged 5.6-46.4 ng g-1 ww. The most frequently detected POPs were the dichlorodiethyltrichloroethane (DDT) metabolite 4,4'DDE, the PCB CB-28, and the BFR polybrominated diphenyl ether BDE-99. These results contribute to the limited POPs data in marine fauna in this remote region, and the Southern Hemisphere, adding to the growing body of evidence that remote regions are affected by global trends of POPs distributions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available