4.7 Article

Degraded polysaccharide from Lycium barbarum L. leaves improve wheat dough structure and rheology

Journal

LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 145, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2021.111372

Keywords

Lycium barbarum L; leaves polysaccharide; Wheat dough; Rheology; Viscoelasticity; Microstructure

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31871801]
  2. Science and Technology Research of Shaanxi Province [2020QFY08-03, 2018TD-020]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The polysaccharides from Lycium barbarum L. leaves, especially the degraded ones, significantly enhanced the texture and extensographic characteristics of wheat dough, improving dough strength and gluten network structure. The chemical degradation of polysaccharides played a major role in transforming the protein secondary structures in the dough samples.
Lycium barbarum L. leaves contain high amounts of mineral rich polysaccharides. In this study, the crude and the degraded polysaccharide using hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and vitamin C were prepared and tested as additives to investigate their effects on the quality of wheat dough using rheological assays. Polysaccharides, in particular degraded polysaccharide, significantly promoted the texture properties and extensographic characteristics of wheat dough compared to the control (p < 0.05), indicating an improvement in dough strength. The gluten networks in the dough samples exhibited dramatically dense and tight characteristics. This could be attributed to the formation of disulfide bonds triggered by the crude and degraded polysaccharides. Besides, analysis revealed that polysaccharides conformation played a major role in the transformation of the protein secondary structures from beta-sheets to beta-turns and alpha-helixes. Results demonstrated that the chemical degradation of polysaccharide could greatly improve the gluten network of wheat dough.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available