4.5 Article

Evaluation of disease staging and chemotherapeutic response in non-small cell lung cancer from patient tumor-derived metabolomic data

Journal

LUNG CANCER
Volume 156, Issue -, Pages 20-30

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2021.04.012

Keywords

Metabolomics; Lung cancer; Chemotherapy; Machine learning; Personalized medicine

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study explores predictive models for staging and chemotherapy response in non-small cell lung cancer based on metabolomic analysis of patient-derived core biopsies. Machine learning techniques were applied to differentiate between different disease statuses and treatment responses with high accuracy. The results demonstrate the potential for comprehensive evaluation of patient-specific metabolic profiles to guide clinical decision-making.
Objectives: Despite extensive effort, the search for clinically-relevant metabolite biomarkers for early detection, disease monitoring, and outcome prediction in lung cancer remains unfulfilled. Although biofluid evaluation has been explored, the complexity inherent in metabolite data and the dynamic discrepancy between metabolites in biofluids vs. tumor tissue have prevented conclusive results. This proof-of-concept study explored models predictive of staging and chemotherapy response based on metabolomic analysis of fresh, patient-derived non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) core biopsies. Materials and methods: Samples (n = 36) were evaluated with high-resolution 2DLC-MS/MS and 13C-glucose enrichment, and the data were comprehensively analyzed with machine learning techniques. Patients were categorized as Disease-Control (DC) [encompassing complete-response (CR), partial-response (PR), and stabledisease (SD)] and Progressive-Disease (PD) in terms of first-line chemotherapy. Four major types of learning methods (partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA), support vector machines (SVM), artificial neural networks, and random forests (RF)) were applied to differentiate between positive (DC and CR/PR) and poor (PD and SD/PD) responses, and between stage I/II/III and stage IV disease. Models were trained with forward feature selection based on variable importance and tested on validation subsets. Results: The models predicted patient classifications in the validation subsets with AUC (95 % CI): DC vs. PD (SVM), 0.970(0.961-0.979); CR/PR vs. SD/PD (PLS-DA), 0.880(0.865-0.895); stage I/II/III vs. IV (SVM), 0.902 (0.880-0.924). Highest performing model was SVM for DC vs. PD (balanced accuracy = 0.92; kappa = 0.74). Conclusion: This study illustrates a comprehensive evaluation of patient tumor-specific metabolic profiles, with the potential to identify disease stage and predict response to first-line chemotherapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available