4.7 Article

A randomised phase II trial of selumetinib vs selumetinib plus temsirolimus for soft-tissue sarcomas

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 112, Issue 10, Pages 1644-1651

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2015.126

Keywords

soft-tissue sarcomas; selumetinib; temsirolimus; leiomyosarcoma

Categories

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health [NO1-CM-2011-00038]
  2. National Comprehensive Cancer Network Temsirolimus Oncology Research Program
  3. AstraZeneca
  4. Pfizer

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The MEK inhibitor, selumetinib, suppresses soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) cell proliferation in vitro. Mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors possess modest activity against STS; however, resistance develops via MAPK pathway feedback activation. The combination of selumetinib and temsirolimus synergistically inhibits STS cell line growth. Therefore, a randomized phase II trial of selumetinib vs selumetinib plus temsirolimus was conducted. Methods: Seventy-one adults with advanced STS who received <= 2 prior chemotherapeutics were randomized to selumetinib 75 mg p.o. bid and allowed to crossover upon progression, or to selumetinib 50 mg p.o. bid plus temsirolimus 20 mg i.v. weekly, with primary endpoint of progression-free survival (PFS). Results: There was no difference in PFS between the two arms for the overall cohort (median 1.9 vs 2.1 months); an improved median PFS was observed in the combination arm (N - 11) over single agent (N - 10) in the prespecified leiomyosarcoma stratum (median 3.7 vs 1.8 months; P = 0.01). Four-month PFS rate was 50% (95% confidence interval 0.19-0.81) with the combination vs 0% with selumetinib alone in the leiomyosarcoma cohort. Most common grade 3/4 adverse events with the combination were mucositis (29%), lymphopenia (26%), neutropenia and anaemia (20% each). Conclusions: While single-agent selumetinib has no significant activity in STS, the combination may be active for leiomyosarcomas.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available