4.5 Article

Ergonomic Analysis of Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery Using Novel Inertial Sensors

Journal

LARYNGOSCOPE
Volume 132, Issue 6, Pages 1153-1159

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/lary.29796

Keywords

Posture; ergonomics; FESS; rhinology; physician health

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study aimed to evaluate the ergonomic positions of surgeons during endoscopic sinus surgery, showing that trainees may adopt higher risk neck postures than attending surgeons. This suggests that interventions for posture should be considered early in training.
Objectives/Hypothesis Suboptimal ergonomics during endoscopic sinus surgery can lead to considerable physical discomfort and fatigue for the surgeon. The purpose of this pilot study is to objectively evaluate the ergonomic positions of trainee and attending surgeons while performing functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS). Study Design Pilot prospective trial. Methods Six surgeons (two attendings and four trainees) performed FESS while wearing 11 inertial measurement units (IMUs) affixed to either side of each major joint. Screen placement was standardized to be 1 m directly in front of the surgeon and on the patient's left, 0-15 degrees declined from the surgeons' eyes. Bed height was standardized such that the workspace was 0 to 10 cm below the elbows. IMU data were analyzed to calculate joint angles. Ideal joint angles (i.e., <10 degrees for neck and trunk) were determined by the validated Rapid Entire Body Assessment tool. Subjects subsequently completed a modified National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index to assess cognitive and physical burden and pain. Student's t-test was employed to detect differences between groups. Results Trainees adopted positions involving significantly greater neck flexion (9.90 degrees vs. -6.48 degrees, P = .03) and reported significantly higher frustration levels (3.04 vs. 1.33, P = .02) while operating than attendings. For both cohorts, increased operative time was significantly correlated with greater back flexion (r = 0.90, P = .02; r = 0.55, P = .04, respectively). Conclusions Our data suggest that trainees operate with higher risk neck postures than do attendings. These data indicate high-risk operative postures may be borne of inexperience and present an opportunity for postural interventions at an early stage of training. Level of Evidence N/A Laryngoscope, 2021

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available